RSS

Facebook to Spruce, AdParlor, Nanigans, TPG, etc: Share Your True Margins with Your Customers, It’s the Law!

26 Aug

A little birdie told me about a change to Facebook’s ads API development policy recently which reads as follows:

“You must, upon request, provide advertisers with a report on their ad spend, and your report must itemize how much advertisers spend on Facebook ads and fees for your service.”

There are several very successful Facebook advertising companies (most of which I named in the headline of this post) that charge clients on a cost per action (CPA) basis. In other words, they guarantee a conversion/sale/sign-up for a flat-fee and hope to make money on the difference between the amount they actually paid Facebook for the conversion and what they charged their client.

Depending upon how savvy the client is, this difference can be massive. Consider this hypothetical scenario: if a client buys 50,000 sign-ups at $5 CPA and each sign-up actually only cost the agency a $3 CPA, the agency is netting $100,000 a month in revenue from this client on spend of $150,000, or a 66% management fee! These days, a management fee of 15% is hard to come by for most agencies and anyone trying to charge 66% would probably be laughed out of a meeting.

My guess is that a lot of these CPA deals on Facebook have very high margins like this. Facebook’s policy now requires these Facebook agencies to disclose this margin – if requested by the advertiser – to their clients. Granted, few clients are likely to know that this policy exists (unless everyone who reads this post spreads it far and wide . . .), but any client that actually does make this request might be shocked – to the point that they either cancel their relationship with the CPA company or immediately demand a major discount off their CPA.

Facebook could decide, of course, to be much more aggressive with this policy and require agencies to disclose the differential between the CPA and the actual cost to acquire a customer, though I’m not sure how they would really enforce this. Who knows, this initial change in the terms may just be a first step. Facebook realizes how much money they are losing to these agencies – forcing agencies to disclose this info will likely result in lower margins for the agencies, which means a higher percentage of overall marketing investment going to actual Facebook advertising over agency profit.

Advertisement
 
3 Comments

Posted by on August 26, 2011 in Uncategorized

 

3 Responses to Facebook to Spruce, AdParlor, Nanigans, TPG, etc: Share Your True Margins with Your Customers, It’s the Law!

  1. fred

    December 4, 2011 at 7:45 pm

    I think you’re wrong on this, I think disclosing this will prevent major ads acquisitions by CPA companies, end customer demand is no way near (in a million years) close to the demand ad buys of an adnetwork

     
  2. davidzhawk

    December 4, 2011 at 8:59 pm

    I’m not sure why it prevents CPA acquisition – it just forces them to be a little more upfront about their margins with their clients!

     
  3. seogear

    February 6, 2012 at 7:55 am

    Thanks for sharing such an interesting information.

     

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.